In Defense of Lady Gaga

3 07 2009

Good evening all you lovely people.

Those of you who are devoted readers to this site may remember my previous entry titled “An Open Letter to Lady Gaga,” where I made remarks about her videos for “PokerFace” and “Just Dance.”  For those of you who are reading for the first time, I encourage you to take a moment and glance at the entry.

Funny stuff, right?

Well, Ms. Gaga has come forward with two new videos for our viewing pleasure, “LoveGame” and “Paparazzi.”  Being the pop-culture enthusiast I am, I had a glance at them.

And, it’s pretty much what I expected.  Electrode-dancing, impractical eyewear, and Ms. Gaga being groped/photographed/engaging in some R-rated PDA/pushed over the railing of a balcony.

Okay, I didn’t see that last one coming.

Let’s take the “LoveGame” video as an example.  In the beginning, she finds herself surrounded by a group of males while sporting both impractical eyewear and a scepter with a glowing ball attached to the top, which I took to symbolize that disco-stick she loves talking about so much.  She is also decked out in a white outfit.  It’s a shame that there wasn’t enough in the budget to buy her the bottom half of the ensemble.  After the chorus, we find Ms. Gaga moving through a subway train with her merry band of gentlemen, who have taken it upon themselves to cop a feel whenever possible.  Good for them, I guess.  Once again there’s a costume change for Ms. Gaga, and once again she finds herself without pants.  Must be spending all her money on those fancy glasses that do absolutely nothing.

And that’s pretty much the whole video.  Gaga finds herself surrounded by men.  Gaga uses her raw sexual power to work the men into a frenzy.  And they dance.

As for “Paparazzi,” I really have no words whatsoever to describe it.  It is indeed epic.  To whet your interest, there is a scene where Ms. Gaga dances in a wheelchair, and is then given those walking braces used by people with limited use of their legs.  She then proceeds dancing as if she has to rely on those braces.  I suppose there’s a message in there somewhere about people with disabilities being as capable as everyone else.  If that’s the case, then Ms. Gaga should be commended for putting out a very positive vibe that everyone should latch onto.

That, or the director thought it’d look cool.  Yeah, that’s probably more accurate.

After viewing the videos, I browsed through the comments sections.  There were the predictable “I love her!” comments, as well as the equally predictable “She sucks!” comments.  A few people, however, decided to go personal, labeling Ms. Gaga with epithets I refuse to put on here, and found to be in bad taste.

“But Zach,” you may be saying to yourselves, “you seem to be critical of Lady Gaga.  Why are you offended by those people who accuse her of being, in safer terms, ‘a lady of the night’?”

Because it’s one thing to criticize a person’s music/dancing/fashion sense.  It’s another thing entirely to hurl slurs and epithets.

So, Ms. Gaga, if by some odd chance you read this, I can give you my word that while I may mock your clothing, your music, and your videos, know that I will never outright slander you.  I will also defend your honor against those who do.

Now please, put on some pants.





2 responses

3 07 2009
In Defense of Lady Gaga

[…] View original here:  In Defense of Lady Gaga […]

3 07 2009
greg smith

“i’m just bluffin’ with my muffin.”

she’s the new madonna, for better or for worse. but i will have to check out those videos. pantless dancing could be instructive.

and don’t know knock useless eyewear. elton john went far with his.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: